Code got 10x faster. Testing didn’t.
Ito automatically tests every PR.
No test writing. No infrastructure to maintain.
.svg){kind=icon}
3 hrs
Spent on manual QA every week, per engineer.
Under 40%
Of post-merge bugs are caught manually.
10% to 20%
Of engineering time goes to maintaining E2E tests.
You’ve underinvested in QA.
On purpose.
Hiring QA engineers
Adds headcount, not velocity. Manual testing doesn’t scale. You’ve traded one coordination problem for another.
Building E2E infrastructure
Playwright, Selenium, CI pipelines. Senior engineers pulled off product work. Ongoing maintenance. Flaky tests. Slow erosion of trust.
Accepting slower releases
Every extra day in the release cycle is a day your competitors are shipping. Thoroughness is good. Thoroughness that costs you the market is not.
What your team stops doing.
Ito doesn’t add work.
It removes work that shouldn’t exist.
.svg){kind=icon}
"Who’s testing this PR?"
.svg){kind=icon}
PM testing afternoons
Senior eng on regression
Post-merge fire drills
Ito helps my team ship faster by testing all edge cases right on their PRs. I refuse to go back to manual testing.
I was very impressed with the zero configuration and all the different pathways it was testing. The computer use capability definitely sets it apart from other tools.
Ito caught 3-4 real things that got fixed in the first week. Impressed that backend mocking works autonomously.
Power of manual QA on every PR lets my team ship faster without a quality tradeoff.
What teams ask before using Ito.
Common questions from engineering managers, senior engineers, and QA leads.
Get started in minutes. Zero-config required. Connect your repository, open a PR, and Ito immediately starts analyzing changes and testing your product.
Ito creates a code aware test plan based on your codebase, PR changes, and PR description. It knows what surface areas were affected by changes and likely failure patterns based on our QA experience.
No, Ito creates its own secure, single-use sandbox environments for each PR.
This is where most E2E tools fail. Ito runs in a managed, deterministic browser environment with automatic service mocking for third-party dependencies (payment processors, email, analytics, etc.) that would otherwise cause intermittent failures.
Ito uses what you give it. With zero config, it mocks external dependencies (payment processors, email, analytics, etc.) that would otherwise cause intermittent failures. We don't want them to get in the way of testing the code changes. You have the ability to add credentials to these services.
Ready to ship faster?
Join 100+ engineers reclaiming their time.